0.0000000000093 yoctometres!
Quantum foam is a proposed structure of space and time at the very smallest scales, where they would churn and fluctuate instead of being smooth. It has never been observed directly, so the 9.3 × 10−36 meters shown above is not a measurement. That number is 9.3 divided by a 1 followed by 36 zeros. Physicists expect the foam, if it exists, to appear at about the Planck length, 1.6 × 10−35 meters, about 1.7 times the figure shown.
Space-time is the three dimensions of space together with time. At every scale that can be measured, it looks smooth. But parts of quantum mechanics, the theory that explains atoms and particles, predict that it would not stay smooth at far smaller scales. Tiny regions would keep changing, and space and time would stop having definite values.
Foam like this has no edge to measure, so what the theories give instead is a scale: the distance at which the foam would show. NASA puts it at about the width of a hydrogen atom's nucleus divided by 100 billion billion (1020). That works out to about the Planck length, the scale at which the quantum effects of gravity are expected to matter. The exact scale depends on the theory, and physicists do not yet have a tested theory that joins gravity with quantum mechanics.
The physicist John Wheeler of Princeton University came up with quantum foam and its name. Quantum mechanics already predicted that particles could briefly pop into and out of existence. Wheeler pictured more than that: space-time itself whipped into a froth of distorted shapes. Wheeler also made the term "black hole" famous.
The foam is far too small to see directly, so astronomers look for its effects on light. If space-time is foamy, the distance light travels would jitter by tiny amounts. In some models, these jitters add up over billions of light-years until distant objects blur out of sight.
In 2015, a team led by Eric Perlman of the Florida Institute of Technology tested this with quasars. A quasar is a very bright object powered by matter falling toward a giant black hole. NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the VERITAS telescopes still detected distant quasars clearly. The team concluded that this ruled out two models of the foam, including one called holographic foam.
The question is not settled. In a 2026 conference paper, Eric Steinbring and Jack Ng, one of the 2015 authors, argued that holographic foam fits the spread in measured positions of an extremely bright gamma-ray burst after all. They present this as one way to read the data. Whether the foam's effects can build up over long distances has been debated for more than 20 years.